One of my favourite fashion designers and environmentalists has died. Liz Claiborne died today at the age of 78 following a courageous battle with cancer. Not only was she the founder of Liz Claiborne Inc. which catered to the professional woman, she and her husband Art Ortenberg were active in environmental and charity work and founded The Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenberg Foundation to provide support for protection of the wilderness.
Ms. Claiborne was honoured in 2000 for her continuing efforts in helping to fight the killing of African elephants for their ivory tusks.
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
U.S. College Students Reminded To Watch out For Terrorist Activity
Various alternative news sources on the Internet, otherwise known as the only news you can believe are reporting recent activity by the FBI visiting several American universities and technical colleges in a stepped-up effort to further their role as Big Brother Brown Shirts to students.
Armed with a set of guidelines to assist American youth in their role as individual terrorist watchdogs, whistleblowers and stool pigeons, college and university administrators have been supplied with thier own copies and told in no uncertain terms that it would be in their best interests to abide by the contents. It's a matter of national security, you see..
Titled "Your Role in Combating The Insider Threat", the guidelines stipulate rules that will prevent American secondary education students from:
The guidelines explain how to spot a suspected terrorist in a set of "Suitablity Issues" which are intended to heighten one's awareness of suitability factors and potential espionage indicators. Suitability factors include this from the guidelines: “one-fourth of known American spies experienced a personal life crisis (such as a divorce, death of someone close, or a love affair gone awry) in the months before they decided to attempt espionage.”
In other words, the FBI wants American college students to believe that their best friend who is in mourning following the death of a parent should now become suspect because that friend now has a high possibility of being recruited by a terrorist group.
Other indicators that your friend or colleague just might be a terrorist include:
In other words, every last teenager in the United States. Read the guidelines here:
http://www.ncix.gov/archives/docs/Your_Role_in_Combating_the_Insider_Threat.pdf
Go to the FBI page on Academic Alliance:
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/april06/academicalliance040506.htm
Armed with a set of guidelines to assist American youth in their role as individual terrorist watchdogs, whistleblowers and stool pigeons, college and university administrators have been supplied with thier own copies and told in no uncertain terms that it would be in their best interests to abide by the contents. It's a matter of national security, you see..
Titled "Your Role in Combating The Insider Threat", the guidelines stipulate rules that will prevent American secondary education students from:
- travelling abroad without seeking permission from the proper authorities
- showing an interest in their colleagues' work
- having friends outside the United States
- working late at the campus
- engaging in independent research
- making extra money without the prior consent of the authorities.
The guidelines explain how to spot a suspected terrorist in a set of "Suitablity Issues" which are intended to heighten one's awareness of suitability factors and potential espionage indicators. Suitability factors include this from the guidelines: “one-fourth of known American spies experienced a personal life crisis (such as a divorce, death of someone close, or a love affair gone awry) in the months before they decided to attempt espionage.”
In other words, the FBI wants American college students to believe that their best friend who is in mourning following the death of a parent should now become suspect because that friend now has a high possibility of being recruited by a terrorist group.
Other indicators that your friend or colleague just might be a terrorist include:
- Drug or alcohol abuse.
- Repeated irresponsibility.
- An “above the rules” attitude.
- Financial irresponsibility.
- Repeated impulsive behaviors.
- Extreme immaturity.
- Willingness to violate the rights of others to achieve one’s own ends.
- Accumulating or overwhelming life crises or career disappointments.
- Willingness to break rules or violations of laws and regulations.
In other words, every last teenager in the United States. Read the guidelines here:
http://www.ncix.gov/archives/docs/Your_Role_in_Combating_the_Insider_Threat.pdf
Go to the FBI page on Academic Alliance:
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/april06/academicalliance040506.htm
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Stephen Harper - The Classic Political Bully
When we hear the word 'bully' we associate the word and the subsequent behaviour to children and teenagers who exert their power over other children in the schoolyard, those they see as weak. But there is another form of bullying that although no more or less damaging, is more difficult to address and to overcome.
It's called Political Bullying and although relatively rare in today's society, the world is seeing examples of the behaviour in pockets throughout the globe. There are two distinct forms of Political Bullying, the first involves bullying by the head of a government toward other nations. An excellent example of off-shore Political Bullying would be the current American Bush administration. The second is much more insidious - bullying by a nation's leader of his or her own people. This second form of in-country Political Bullying is my topic for today.
Canada, early in 2006 elected into power a man who promised to change the way the federal government does business. Relying heavily on an opposition political party who had remained in power for well over a decade and subsequently became mired in arrogance and corruption, Conservative leader Stephen Harper based his election campaign on promises of openness, fairness and accountability in government to a voter demographic who were so fed up with the long-ruling Liberals that they granted Harper a minority government.
During the campaign Harper had his critics, who accused him of a desire to become fully integrated with the United States while others issued warnings of Harper's secret agenda to further involve Canada in the wars of either Iraq or Afghanistan. Both warnings have since proven correct which have been reflected in Canada's participation in the Bush-initiated Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and our country's ongoing commitment to the war in Afghanistan which since 2002 has claimed the lives of 60 Canadian soldiers.
Of late another side of Stephen Harper has been emerging that could lead to a devastatingly divided country as he pits one part of Canada against another. I speak of course of the Atlantic Accords, signed, sealed and delivered between the previous federal government and the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland/Labrador. A contract that Harper himself promised during his campaign, not to touch.
The prime minister however went back on his word earlier this year when his finance minister introduced his annual federal budget. One specific section of the budget in effect canceled the Accords and forced both provinces to choose between a new formula for equalization. They could opt to keep the Accords but millions of offshore revenue dollars would be clawed back by the feds if they did. The federal government under Harper's leadership broke the contract.
The first hint that Harper is afflicted with Political Bullying came in a statement to the press after a reporter asked his reaction to Atlantic Canada's assertion that he had illegally broken a signed contract. In a nutshell, Harper with arrogance accompanied by a barely concealed sense of malice invited the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland to "sue me". This writer had visions of Nelson Muntz, the bully on The Simpsons pointing his finger at Atlantic Canada and uttering his famous "Ha Ha!".
Confirmation of Harper's Political Bullying came just yesterday during a short trip to New Brunswick. Harper came bearing millions of much-needed dollars to bestow upon that province's infrastructure. In his presentation speech Harper declared his Political Bullying personality by sending a message to Nova Scotia and Newfoundland that the New Brunswick example is what happens when one cooperates with the feds.
So what is a Political Bully? As we know, bullying occurs when someone conducts themselves in a manner which exerts power over others whom they perceive as weak. Bullying methods include:
*demeaning their victims
*isolating victims from groups and/or manipulating their allies
*ignoring them
*threatening them
*causing feelings of discomfort and/or anger
*taking and/or damaging their possessions
*making them participate in activities against their will.
As you can see, 100% of the above bullying methods have been practiced by Stephen Harper against Atlantic Canada. But why, you might be asking do some people bully others. The answers of course are complex and wide-ranging but the majority of Political Bullies see their methods as a way of making them look assertive and in charge. Other reasons behind the Political Bully's tactics include their constant need to be the centre of attention and to be admired (if not feared) by others.
Political bullies surround themselves with more political bullies. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty is a perfect example of a Subordinate Political Bully. They are almost never heard from unless they feel the need to remind the primary Political Bully that they're still behind him and usually a short loud burst of "yeah, what he said" will be sufficient in securing their seemingly exalted position in the pack. But a puzzling scenario emerges as we witness the number of non-bullies who will align themselves with the pack. These non-bullying entities see themselves as weaker than the Political and Subordinate Bullies and therefore vulnerable to becoming targets if they refuse to go along. Examples of weaker powerless non-bullying entities would be Peter MacKay and Gerald Keddy.
So as you can see Stephen Harper displays the classic characteristics of a Political Bully. Specific to the Harper model is a new trait that will no doubt be attributed to Political Bullies of the future, specifically the emergence of a seemingly cold lack of human emotion. Harper demonstrated this characteristic early on in his tenure when as he escorted his two young children to school, instead of a warm embrace he shook the hand of his young daughter in what could only be described as a cold and stilted demonstration of an emotion he finds puzzling - affection. In retrospect this incident should have been the first red flag that Harper wasn't what he appeared to be.
Atlantic Canada can expect to be on the receiving end of Political Bullying tactics for some time. This particular region of the country has been historically perceived by Political and Secondary Bullies as a prime target and proof of that is demonstrated in our ongoing "have-not" designation. Our struggles to rise up from that negative status in an effort to join the wealthier and more powerful "haves" is seen by Political and Secondary Bullies as extremely threatening.
And we're all learning the consequences of threatening a pack of Political Bullies.
It's called Political Bullying and although relatively rare in today's society, the world is seeing examples of the behaviour in pockets throughout the globe. There are two distinct forms of Political Bullying, the first involves bullying by the head of a government toward other nations. An excellent example of off-shore Political Bullying would be the current American Bush administration. The second is much more insidious - bullying by a nation's leader of his or her own people. This second form of in-country Political Bullying is my topic for today.
Canada, early in 2006 elected into power a man who promised to change the way the federal government does business. Relying heavily on an opposition political party who had remained in power for well over a decade and subsequently became mired in arrogance and corruption, Conservative leader Stephen Harper based his election campaign on promises of openness, fairness and accountability in government to a voter demographic who were so fed up with the long-ruling Liberals that they granted Harper a minority government.
During the campaign Harper had his critics, who accused him of a desire to become fully integrated with the United States while others issued warnings of Harper's secret agenda to further involve Canada in the wars of either Iraq or Afghanistan. Both warnings have since proven correct which have been reflected in Canada's participation in the Bush-initiated Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and our country's ongoing commitment to the war in Afghanistan which since 2002 has claimed the lives of 60 Canadian soldiers.
Of late another side of Stephen Harper has been emerging that could lead to a devastatingly divided country as he pits one part of Canada against another. I speak of course of the Atlantic Accords, signed, sealed and delivered between the previous federal government and the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland/Labrador. A contract that Harper himself promised during his campaign, not to touch.
The prime minister however went back on his word earlier this year when his finance minister introduced his annual federal budget. One specific section of the budget in effect canceled the Accords and forced both provinces to choose between a new formula for equalization. They could opt to keep the Accords but millions of offshore revenue dollars would be clawed back by the feds if they did. The federal government under Harper's leadership broke the contract.
The first hint that Harper is afflicted with Political Bullying came in a statement to the press after a reporter asked his reaction to Atlantic Canada's assertion that he had illegally broken a signed contract. In a nutshell, Harper with arrogance accompanied by a barely concealed sense of malice invited the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland to "sue me". This writer had visions of Nelson Muntz, the bully on The Simpsons pointing his finger at Atlantic Canada and uttering his famous "Ha Ha!".
Confirmation of Harper's Political Bullying came just yesterday during a short trip to New Brunswick. Harper came bearing millions of much-needed dollars to bestow upon that province's infrastructure. In his presentation speech Harper declared his Political Bullying personality by sending a message to Nova Scotia and Newfoundland that the New Brunswick example is what happens when one cooperates with the feds.
So what is a Political Bully? As we know, bullying occurs when someone conducts themselves in a manner which exerts power over others whom they perceive as weak. Bullying methods include:
*demeaning their victims
*isolating victims from groups and/or manipulating their allies
*ignoring them
*threatening them
*causing feelings of discomfort and/or anger
*taking and/or damaging their possessions
*making them participate in activities against their will.
As you can see, 100% of the above bullying methods have been practiced by Stephen Harper against Atlantic Canada. But why, you might be asking do some people bully others. The answers of course are complex and wide-ranging but the majority of Political Bullies see their methods as a way of making them look assertive and in charge. Other reasons behind the Political Bully's tactics include their constant need to be the centre of attention and to be admired (if not feared) by others.
Political bullies surround themselves with more political bullies. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty is a perfect example of a Subordinate Political Bully. They are almost never heard from unless they feel the need to remind the primary Political Bully that they're still behind him and usually a short loud burst of "yeah, what he said" will be sufficient in securing their seemingly exalted position in the pack. But a puzzling scenario emerges as we witness the number of non-bullies who will align themselves with the pack. These non-bullying entities see themselves as weaker than the Political and Subordinate Bullies and therefore vulnerable to becoming targets if they refuse to go along. Examples of weaker powerless non-bullying entities would be Peter MacKay and Gerald Keddy.
So as you can see Stephen Harper displays the classic characteristics of a Political Bully. Specific to the Harper model is a new trait that will no doubt be attributed to Political Bullies of the future, specifically the emergence of a seemingly cold lack of human emotion. Harper demonstrated this characteristic early on in his tenure when as he escorted his two young children to school, instead of a warm embrace he shook the hand of his young daughter in what could only be described as a cold and stilted demonstration of an emotion he finds puzzling - affection. In retrospect this incident should have been the first red flag that Harper wasn't what he appeared to be.
Atlantic Canada can expect to be on the receiving end of Political Bullying tactics for some time. This particular region of the country has been historically perceived by Political and Secondary Bullies as a prime target and proof of that is demonstrated in our ongoing "have-not" designation. Our struggles to rise up from that negative status in an effort to join the wealthier and more powerful "haves" is seen by Political and Secondary Bullies as extremely threatening.
And we're all learning the consequences of threatening a pack of Political Bullies.
The Brainwashing of America is Almost Complete. Now What?
Ever wondered why there hasn't been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since September 11, 2001? It's certainly not the result of finely-tuned Homeland Security efforts. They couldn't even contain one TB patient.
Is the average American citizen fearful of being attacked by terrorists using dirty bombs or biological agents or even both?
How many times has U.S. President George W. Bush warned his fellow citizens of an impending "second 9-11"? How many times does one have to be told something before they begin to believe it?
What about "al Qaeda"? How does the average American citizen visualize them? Have they, in one's mind's eye morphed into a 10-foot tall hulking fire-breathing entity who live and breath nothing beyond their inborn compulsion to kill Americans?
And why doesn't the American administration talk about Osama bin Laden anymore? He's still a wanted man, according to official doctrines. He's still the "mastermind" behind 9-11, according to those same doctrines. He was the reason the U.S. went into Afghanistan immediately after 9-11 on their search & destroy mission to find him. So why is he no longer important? Could he be dead? Could the U.S. admin know that?
As you try to answer the above questions, imagine a scenario whereby 350 million people have been continuously manipulated, conditioned, led by the nose, lied to and terrorized by their own government. How would it feel to suddenly realize that everything you have come to believe and fear in the last five years wasn't real? Wag The Dog, indeed...
Ready for some reality? Click this. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070624&articleId=6134
Is the average American citizen fearful of being attacked by terrorists using dirty bombs or biological agents or even both?
How many times has U.S. President George W. Bush warned his fellow citizens of an impending "second 9-11"? How many times does one have to be told something before they begin to believe it?
What about "al Qaeda"? How does the average American citizen visualize them? Have they, in one's mind's eye morphed into a 10-foot tall hulking fire-breathing entity who live and breath nothing beyond their inborn compulsion to kill Americans?
And why doesn't the American administration talk about Osama bin Laden anymore? He's still a wanted man, according to official doctrines. He's still the "mastermind" behind 9-11, according to those same doctrines. He was the reason the U.S. went into Afghanistan immediately after 9-11 on their search & destroy mission to find him. So why is he no longer important? Could he be dead? Could the U.S. admin know that?
As you try to answer the above questions, imagine a scenario whereby 350 million people have been continuously manipulated, conditioned, led by the nose, lied to and terrorized by their own government. How would it feel to suddenly realize that everything you have come to believe and fear in the last five years wasn't real? Wag The Dog, indeed...
Ready for some reality? Click this. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070624&articleId=6134
Monday, 25 June 2007
Ellen DeGeneres Greeting Card Collection!
If you love Ellen DeGeneres, you're really going to love her newly launched signature line of greeting cards. Debuting today (Monday) across Canada in stores carrying Carleton Card products, the ellen collection(TM) will offer consumers a variety of greeting cards for several occasions which will offer the lucky recipients a glimpse into the quirky and hilarious mind of one of the most beloved media personalities today.
The 32-card ellen collection will feature the comedian's own designs along with her observations about ordinary, daily life situations. Selections will be available for birthdays, friendship, thank you and encouragement. The cards show DeGeneres in many of her trademark fashions, like crisp white pants, argyle sweaters, button-down shirts and Chuck Taylor-like sneakers. Her love for animals is also incorporated into several designs that show her with "Pig," her famous white French bulldog.
One of the thank you cards shows Ellen and Pig on the front, and says, "Wow. Thanks. Does this mean I have to do something nice for you now?" A birthday card in the ellen collection(TM) shows Ellen dancing while Pig looks on. The message on the front says, "Your birthday makes me wanna dance!" while the inside explains, "...which is weird because I'm in line at the DMV and now everyone's staring at me. Enjoy your day."
Cards in the ellen collection(TM) are available across Canada at participating drug, department and grocery stores that carry Carlton Cards for $3.59 each. Carlton Cards and American Greetings stores in Canada and the U.S. will also carry the full 32-card line.
The 32-card ellen collection will feature the comedian's own designs along with her observations about ordinary, daily life situations. Selections will be available for birthdays, friendship, thank you and encouragement. The cards show DeGeneres in many of her trademark fashions, like crisp white pants, argyle sweaters, button-down shirts and Chuck Taylor-like sneakers. Her love for animals is also incorporated into several designs that show her with "Pig," her famous white French bulldog.
One of the thank you cards shows Ellen and Pig on the front, and says, "Wow. Thanks. Does this mean I have to do something nice for you now?" A birthday card in the ellen collection(TM) shows Ellen dancing while Pig looks on. The message on the front says, "Your birthday makes me wanna dance!" while the inside explains, "...which is weird because I'm in line at the DMV and now everyone's staring at me. Enjoy your day."
Cards in the ellen collection(TM) are available across Canada at participating drug, department and grocery stores that carry Carlton Cards for $3.59 each. Carlton Cards and American Greetings stores in Canada and the U.S. will also carry the full 32-card line.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)